Comments on: Toilet Wax Ring Review: Bol Wax vs. No Seep

By: Jennifer

Jennifer — Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:06:27 +0000

Interesting! I’ll have to watch out for that. We used the kind with the gasket… but only because we wanted a taller wax ring to smoosh.

By: Fred

Fred — Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:46:43 +0000

Yeah - it rather seems silly now that I tried to save the $2.60… I will say that sometimes these things pay off - like when I bought the cheerios knock-off on the bottom shelf at Giant and they tasted just as good as the original

Had a *realized* how important that little gasket was, this would have been an easier decision from the start. Hopefully the post saves someone else the hassle.

By: jim

jim — Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:58:07 +0000

I’m a fan of the No-Seep version, with such small dollar amounts, and I’m a cheap guy… but it’s silly to be comparing percentages.

By: southsideandy

southsideandy — Sat, 29 Mar 2008 03:15:35 +0000

“A small price to pay…”

Indeed. But that said, how many toilets, really, are you installing in a house? I have three toilets, so I’m more than willing to spend the extra $10 (estimating for tax).

Especially since I’ve used No-Seep twice now with no problems at all.

By: Fred

Fred — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:11:03 +0000

Corey-Thanks for the heads up. I made the change. Feel free to let me know if you see it wrong anywhere else!

By: Corey

Corey — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:21:11 +0000

Small price to pay for peace of mind…

A heads up that link to your blog on houseblogs.net sill leads you to the blogspot account. The individual entries are correct, but your profile needs updating.