There’s a headline you probably won’t see in the evening news. Unfortunately, it’s the only punishment dolled out to the arsonist that set Amy’s and Lori’s house on fire last October. (FYI - Amy and Lori are Kim’s sisters, my sisters-in-law).
I’ve been reluctant to post about the ordeal online, primarily because writing about someone else’s misfortune can remind them of the pain of the incident. Also, the story is so detailed, it is hard to do it justice in a blog-sized post. That said, it’s been 6 months, and Amy said I can write about it, so I’ll give it a shot. The big question for the community is at the end - I hope you’ll weigh in.
In late October 2007, around 10pm, Amy and Lori were talking in their kitchen. A domestic dispute in the neighbors’ place had just died down. (These disputes were not uncommon and the wall between the units was thin). Apparently frustrated with the situation, the owner of the left side of the duplex, a man in his late 60s, left to go to the local bar. The woman living with him, in her 50s and apparently high on drugs, was so mad that she decided to light a fire in the back room on the first floor to get back at him.
Another neighbor saw the fire and thought it was an accidental kitchen fire. He came running in to help. The woman wouldn’t let him in, saying that she had lit the fire and wanted to let it burn! She then went outside to survey the damage and discovered the fire wasn’t burning fast enough, and that the fire department was audibly on it’s way. So, she went back inside and lit a second fire, this one on the second floor in the front of the house! The neighbor who tried to help put out the fire quickly alerted Amy and Lori – banging on the door and yelling (thank goodness!). In minutes, the left side of the duplex was engulfed in flames.
When the fire department arrived, they did what all firefighters do. They aggressively contained and extinguished the fire, which of course created more damage on Amy’s half. The picture on the right is of her master bedroom. We had spent months refinishing the upstairs. You can see the remains of the original pine floors beneath the ash. The combination of smoke, soot, and water damage in both homes is in excess of $150,000!
Amy has been working with the insurance company to get her half restored. That process has been long and arduous, but is finally under way and looking promising.
The police charged the woman with multiple crimes, but, the case never went to trial. This April, the arsonist agreed to a plea deal that allowed her to walk with only 3 years probation and a requirement to get mental health / drug addition treatment. Amy was not given any opportunity to testify.
As a result of the fire, Amy and Lori will be displaced for about 12 months, and of course could have been killed. We’re hopeful that insurance will completely restore the place, but that hasn’t been an easy road, either. Things are progressing now, and I’m hoping to do a great Before and After post when everything’s wrapped up.
—
So my thought on this is that the arsonist should have been required to serve significant jail time - at least 1 year, and should have been sentenced to probation and community service after that.
What do you think? Was the sentence fair? Would any additional information make it easier for you to decide?